Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 6:55 PM +0200 9/2/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote: >>- do we keep these opcodes?
> Yes. Ok. >> If yes some permutations are missing. > Yeah. I'd as soon leave them out until we need them. Well, the asymmetry makes it harder for compilers to emit proper code. "Is that variant already implemented". So I'd rather have it complete. > These can move into the standard library. Rand's probably a good > candidate for a PMC, but that's a separate thing. It *is* a PMC. The opcodes got added later. leo
