On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Larry Wall wrote:
with a named abstraction is not terribly useful. The "whichness" of C<?> happens subconsciously, whereas having a named hash forces
As I said in my other mail, the more I think of this the more it seems to me to be reasonable and even "natural". It's "which?-ness", though! ;-)
Michele --
I hold a square measuring 10x10 metres away from a person who is standing 100 metres away. I ask them to shoot the square with a high-accuracy gun.
Don't stand there holding the square when they are shooting... - Robert Israel in sci.math, "Re: Scaling"
