Jeff Clites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Two questions: > > 1) Is it supposed to be possible to invoke a given continuation more > than once, or is it "used up" once invoked?
Yes, you should be able to invoke one more than once. > > 2) Am I supposed to be able to "jump down" the stack by invoking a > continuation? To be specific, if "A calls B calls C", and C invokes the > return continuation which takes it directly back to A, can something > later invoke the return continuation which leads to B? (Emphasizing > there the notion that something "skipped over" a continuation, then > later came back and used it.) Yes.
