Aaron Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 03:53, Leopold Toetsch wrote: >> We already have the Random PMC with vtables to create random numbers. >> There's really no need to have opcodes too. If there aren't serious >> arguments for keeping these opcodes, they'll be removed for the release.
> Didn't you and I specifically have this discussion when I wrote those > opcodes? Yes ;) I wasn't really happy with these opcodes. It got worse. These opcodes instantiate objects of type Random, which doesn't cope with better or different implementations of another Rand PMC type. And Random number generation isn't really fast, so there is no need to have opcodes for these. leo
