Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are we comfortable adding the dynclasses to the default build target?
I think it can go in. > I want to at some point, if only to make really sure that we don't > break them. (As stuff that gets built and tested by default stays up > to date, while the rest... tends not to) Good point. We need tests: 1) basic operation: is dynclass loading working (current samples, modified not to use absolute type numbers) 2) Where should dynamic {tcl, perl, python, ...}_classes tests go? t/xt/$lang # xt for extension and test sorting? leo