All: In collecting the historical data for the benchmark statistics and graphs, I discovered that there were a few days where I had to play the CVS time game to get a working parrot for that day. I expected this.
What I have found interesting though is when individual benchmarks don't work. For instance, from 10/20 to 10/22, gc_generations and gc_header_reuse would just hange (still running after 10 minutes). Last night (11/3 at 23:59) addit2.imc is doing the same thing. I checked a up to the minute checkout and it is finishing now - but there is no printed output. So I have 2 questions: 1. Would people prefer missing data for benchmarks where they won't work or a manually entered high number to draw attention to them? 2. Should we be checking that the output of the benchmarks (right or wrong) is consistent? Cheers Joshua Gatcomb a.k.a. Limbic~Region __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com