Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW, it may be very possible for me to write the p6ge generator so > that it can be switched between the PIR and bsr/ret calling conventions, > so we don't need to resolve this entirely now. And we could then benchmark > the two against each other.
That would be really great. There are a lot of things to consider, which might or might not have an influence. - tailcalls are faster then bsr/ret - error traceback: not really easy with bsr/ret - GC issues: the stack pushes consume GC-able object - calling back into PIR (might work seemlessly or not - it's untested) > Pm Thanks, leo
