On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 01:25:29PM -0600, Rod Adams wrote: > Dan Brian wrote: > > >>If I went with "get", the opposite would be "unget" for both historical > >>and huffmaniacal reasons. > > > > > >But "get" has too strong a class accessor connotation in most OO. > > > >"unpull?" ;-) > > > > > pushf/popf. f is for "front".
Ew! I'd prefer :head/:tail modifiers to push/pop over that. But ... > But I still don't see anything wrong with shift/unshift. Neither do I. -Scott -- Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
