On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:09:19 -0500, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Good point--we should. That'd mean we'd want to have three sets of > data: the invoked full/base name, the 'program' full/base name, and > the interpreter full/base name.
Then we can use this to have parrot look for .include's and dynclasses from the root parrot directory? (See #32178) -- matt diephouse http://matt.diephouse.com
