Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I see. Does this morphing work as designed? Creating an array out of >> an undef feels somewhat wrong.
> Yes and yes ;) > A longer answer is: all operators currently need an existing LHS. [snip] Thanks for explaining things. >> I guess the lesson here is: Don't mess with Undef, it's ... undefined. > Or for the test case: check the return result of C<dlfunc>. Thought so, too. I'll open a ticket. Ron
