William Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After some distractions I got back to this today.

> After doing the merge and resolving all the conflicts (of which there
> really weren't that many), I get it to build, and then get a:

Great. So 0.1.2 will be delayed until its in?

> I'll keep poking at it. Looks like a bootstrapping problem on string
> initialization.

Are the encoding_init() / chartype_init() lines enabled in
string.c:string_init()?

leo

Reply via email to