On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 12:25:28PM -0800, Larry Wall wrote: > It is good to have a general mechanism for wrapping any binary op > up as a hyper op. We'll eventually have to extend that idea into > the parser as well so that we don't have to dup all the operators, > but first things first.
Yup, my thoughts exactly. I'll hyper-opify the parser this weekend, if Luke did not beat me to it. Oh, btw, is there some more documents for the &statement:<> level parsing and handling somewhere, or at least a general overview of how those things are defined? :) Thanks, /Autrijus/
pgp98YRrUGL0K.pgp
Description: PGP signature
