Larry Wall skribis 2005-03-16 12:17 (-0800): > for @foo {...} > is actually short for: > for @foo -> $_ is rw {...}
Has there been any decision on <-> yet? If <-> is there, it's much easier to say that without arguments, <-> $_ is used. That way, there is no surprising magic "is rw", but just another operator (that happens to be the exact same thing in practice). Juerd -- http://convolution.nl/maak_juerd_blij.html http://convolution.nl/make_juerd_happy.html http://convolution.nl/gajigu_juerd_n.html