On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 10:03:45PM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
> Hmm, well, if it got that far.  Given strict being on by default,
> this particular example should probably just die on the fact that $"
> isn't declared, since there's no $" in Perl 6.

Is $" okay as a variable name?  Is everything from perlvar.pod legal? :)

    my $" = 3;

Pugs parses that because it only considers $! and $/ as legal
symbolic variable names.

Thanks,
/Autrijus/

Attachment: pgplt5AkiFRpj.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to