> These seem completely and utterly wrong to me. Surely the kwalitee
> checks should be purely that the POD is correct and sufficiently covers
> the module?
One problem I can see with this is that (I think) the only way to
indicate extra private methods is to do so in pod-coverage.t. For
instance:
pod_coverage_ok(
"My::Module",
{ also_private => [ qr/^conf$/ ], },
"My::Module, POD coverage, but marking the 'conf' sub as private"
);
My::Module will pass its own pod-coverage.t script, but it won't pass
with someone else's pod-coverage.t.
Maybe there should be a different way of marking additional private
methods?
Michael
--
Michael Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
