Quoting #parrot: <@autrijus> when I say ".local pmc foo", what happens at INS? < leo> nothing - that just declares the name "foo" being a P symbol <@autrijus> and its scope is... .sub ? < leo> yep, .sub / .end <@autrijus> so there's no notion of lexical scopes? <@autrijus> in IMC level <@autrijus> it's all .sub (dynamic scope) <@autrijus> and no inner .sub s < leo> no - I asked several times if that would be useful < leo> - no inner subs
I find this ... surprising. How is Perl 6 supposed to implement its idea of %MY:: if there's no lexical scoping other than in .subs, and there are no nested .subs? -- Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Open Source is not an excuse to write fun code then leave the actual work to others.