Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, no point in dividing that. It's been suggested to create a > libparrotvm at some point, with PBC support but no imcc/pir/ast(?); > but given our target languages, I don't see that it would get much > usage...?
No eval-like functionality. OTOH it could be useful in secure environments: just run the PBC that is there, nothing else. leo
