Larry Wall skribis 2005-03-29 9:27 (-0800): > and write _.method, which is of dubious merit. Or we could use `<>, > `[], `(), and `method if we don't use ` for qx. I daresay `method > would probably be used more than qx for many styles of programming.
Hey, look at that, backticks again :) If the community rejected %hash`key because it was "ugly" (I still disagree), then will it accept `keys to mean $_.keys? And doesn't consistency want %hash`keys to be as valid as %hash.keys, then? That's dangerously close to %hash`key, even though it means something else. > ?$B$=$& ?$B$G$9 ?$B$M... Hmm... (Someone translate this for me, please :)) > There will certainly be a single topic. The only question is whether . > will ever default to it. Any defaulting to a variable that isn't $_ practically introduces a 2nd/Nth topic, even if it isn't officially called topic. Juerd -- http://convolution.nl/maak_juerd_blij.html http://convolution.nl/make_juerd_happy.html http://convolution.nl/gajigu_juerd_n.html
