* Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-06T23:29:40] > >Finally, the scoreboard does have a purpose. Part of the original idea of > >CPANTS was to provide an automated checklist for a good distribution. > > > >Has a README... check > >Declares a $VERSION... check > >Well behaved tarball... no > > And as far as I can tell, got sidetracked along the way with "scores". > People have to actually fiddle to work out what there scores are... > > Where's the per-module page on CPANTS that lists these simple check/fail? > > Where's the per-author page that has the great big table with module > name down the side, and test names across the top and green/red boxes > indicating pass/fail?
http://rjbs.manxome.org/cpants/cpants.ql source: http://rjbs.manxome.org/cpants/cpants.ql.txt -- rjbs
pgpPA6R7omDmc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
