Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think I understand the implementation details leading to each > behaviour, but rather than saying which was "right", I think I'd be > quite happy to see Perl6 copy (the ideas behind) C's rules regarding > sequence points and undefined behaviour. I'm not so sure about > implementation defined and unspecified behaviour.
Isn't this the old prefix-++ problem: @a = (++$i,++$i,++$i); print "@a"; # prints 3 3 3 -- Johan
