Re: Nested captures

[Fagyal Csongor]

Autrijus Tang wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 12:37:06AM +0200, Fagyal Csongor wrote:
 

Damian Conway wrote:
   

  print @array[1st..($n)th];
     

Sounds cool, but what about $n = 0; ?
   

Then it would be 0..-1, an empty range.
 

Yep, but I mean in general isn't it confusing that the 0th element is 
actually the -1st (in Perl5 sense)? Does this mean that the -1st (Perl6) 
element would be the -2nd (Perl5)? Or are (-n)th elements invalid?

- Fagzal