On 5/27/05, Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Class::Agreement's contracts should be > > nearly as light as putting "die unless" in your methods. > > What? I had no idea. Was that in the docs and I overlooked it? To > me, this is probably one of the strongest features of Class::Agreement > and should definitely be hyped. Many aren't going to use > Class::Contract due to the performance hit.
Argle -- I've forgotten to explain the whole joke! An "agreement" is lighter than a "contract." Hence, Class::Agreement. Har, har. -- Ian Langworth
