On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 03:00:03PM -0700, Kevin Scaldeferri wrote: > On Jun 1, 2005, at 2:35 PM, James E Keenan wrote: > > >Kevin Scaldeferri wrote: > >>I'm looking at a bit of output from Devel::Cover that I imagine has > >>to be a bug. I'll try my best to reproduce the HTML output: > >>stmt branch cond sub time code > >>221862 100 100 _____ 1613639 next if > >>($line =~ /^\s*[#!]/ || $line =~ /^\s*$/); > > > >>If you look at the subroutine coverage page, it claims that there is > >>a BEGIN block uncovered at that line. > >... nor have I seen an uncovered BEGIN block. But that may just be a > >side effect of the sort of things I've been doing coverage analysis > >on. > > Well, there is no BEGIN block there at all, so that suggests something > funny is going on.
Certainly. Of course, it's always possible and quite likely that there is a bug in my code somewhere. But there is also a chance that I am conflating two ops, since I have yet to come up with a way to uniquely identify an op (suggestions welcome). You're not running on 5.6.x are you? -- Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pjcj.net
