On 6/8/05, Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In other words, it outputs: > > > > Foo > > Foo > > # dies
Yep. My mistake. > If that works, then I think it means we can write: > > sub call-with-current-continuation(Code $code) { > my $cc = -> $retval { return $retval } > $code($cc); > } > > Which I personally think is rather cute. Even if I can't quite bring myself to > believe it's that simple... Yeah, that's pretty. But that will bite people who don't understand continuations; it will bite people who don't understand "return"; it will even bite people who understand continuations, because they can be made in such an awkward form so easily. Currently call/cc is done like this: sub call_with_current_continuation(&code) { &code(&?CALLER_CONTINUATION); } But that might be broken in pugs at the moment. Luke