On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 03:02:58PM +0100, Nik Clayton wrote: > >Although I don't mind writing tests, I'd prefer a > >test function that doesn't force me to think about the syntax of the test > >function and let me focus on writing test cases to match the documentation. > > Although there are many cases in which DWIMery is good, I'm not sure > that writing tests is one of them. Otherwise, how can you be sure that > the test is actually testing what you mean, and not what the computer > thought you meant?
I'd tend to agree. Also foo($source, $destination) is pretty universal. -- Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern Just call me 'Moron Sugar'. http://www.somethingpositive.net/sp05182002.shtml
