On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 03:52 -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 01:45:11PM +0300, George Nistorica wrote: > > My guess is that you could add a comment here: > > http://gauss.ffii.org/PatentView/EP1170667/Comments?action=edit&backto=PatentView/EP1170667 > > and express your point of view. > > > > I hope this patent will not be granted ... > > Its already been granted.
Indeed, but still, it can be revoked by EPO. That's what I'm hoping, that it will be revoked. > > -- #!/usr/bin/perl -w ################### use strict;########################### ( $_ = qq{0912 3c1217 709073043p2it//, '"70kc1H 270P 70htonA t3uJ" tni7p'8;}) =~ tr/42179038/(larves)/;eval#uate; ######################################