On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 02:56:53PM +0100, Adrian Howard wrote: > >Calling builder() is safer than Test::Builder->new as it is forward > >compatible for a day when each module will be able to have its own > >Test::Builder object rather than the strict singleton it is now. > [snip] > > In that case should we be encouraging people to write > > sub ok ($;$) { > Test::Simple->builder->ok(@_); > } > > instead of using a package lexical, in case people want to swap > modules at runtime?
Yep, I was thinking about just that this morning... err, afternoon. -- Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern Don't try the paranormal until you know what's normal. -- "Lords and Ladies" by Terry Prachett