On Sat, 2005-07-30 at 11:50 +0100, Adrian Howard wrote: > I took chromatic to mean that he'd like the test harness to do the > decorating...
Yep -- that way you don't have to munge whatever formatting Test::Harness::Straps does, you just decorate on a method that does the formatting for you. > (BTW chromatic: I'm curious why you didn't break todo tests into > separate passing/failing classes as you did the "normal" test?) TAP doesn't, so I didn't see any reason to do it. Now that you mention it, reporting unexpected successes might be worthwhile -- but then again, Test::Harness::Straps reports that as a bonus in the summary anyway. I can't think of anything useful to do with it, but if there is something, I'm happy to make that separation. -- c
