On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 06:03:18AM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote: > On 8/10/05, Autrijus Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But it's an toplevel optimization, which is not applicable to > > module authors. So I'd very much welcome a lexical pragma that > > forces static binding of subroutine calls. > > Yeah, but the whole point of not allowing that is so that you can > override modules when you need to.
No. A lexical static binding pragma controls the function I _call_; the outlawed "is final / is closed" is to control the functions I _define_. Also, runtime rebinding of the actual function I call is always possible, provided that it's rebound to something of compatible type. Thanks, /Autrijus/
pgpbuxt4ikQth.pgp
Description: PGP signature
