On 8/16/05, Ingo Blechschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > 1_234; # surely 1234 > 1e23; # surely 1 * 10**23 > > 1._5; # call of method "_5" on 1? > 1._foo; # call of method "_foo" on 1? > > 1.e5; # 1.0 * 10**5? > 1.efoo; # call of method "efoo" on 1? > 1.e_foo; # call of method "e_foo" on 1? > > 0xFF.dead; # call of method "dead" on 0xFF?
I think we should go with the method call semantics in all of the ambiguous forms, mostly because "no such method: Int::e5" is clearer than silently succeeding and the error coming up somewhere else. Luke
