Leopold Toetsch wrote: > >> I do agree with test-driven development. That is exactly the approach I >> took. > > Well, I agree - until I see such tests (pyint_1): > > $P2 = $P1.__abs__($P1)
Take a look at the difference between r7254 and r7312. The tests originally passed without a self argument. Then I was told that that was all wrong, so I changed it (both the test and the code). Now Kevin is being told that passing self is all wrong. Reverting that particular change is not all that difficult. And it can be done without gutting. - Sam Ruby
