On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 05:04:15PM +0000, Luke Palmer wrote: > On 9/8/05, Benjamin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Pugs currently implements &infix:<!!> as an ugly version of the > > &infix:<nor> operator. > > > > Are these in the spec? > > No they are not. Destroy!
In revisions XXXX, and XXXX-XXX, I proceeded to excise nor and !! and carry out the ??:: to ??!! change. Luckily it appears that nor has been neither tested nor used. I've tried to change all the code in the pugs tree to use ??!!, but I've very possibly missed something, so people need to check their code too. -- Benjamin "integral" Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
