* Chris Dolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-05 12:20]:
> Things that PPI/Perl::Critic could judge that might lead to
> quantitative, non-controversial metrics:
Pretty good suggests, but I think the following may have to be
lessened:
> * what's the ratio of globals to subroutines? (smaller is better)
Does that include file-scoped lexicals? ’Cause in that case I
disagree – I’m just overhauling a module, in which process I’m
also moving it to inside-out object style, and so I’ve got about
20 file-scoped lexical hashes. But that doesn’t at all mean the
code is really full of globals.
Regards,
--
#Aristotle
*AUTOLOAD=*_=sub{s/(.*)::(.*)/print$2,(",$\/"," ")[defined wantarray]/e;$1};
&Just->another->Perl->hacker;
