>>>>> "J" == Juerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
J> Ingo Blechschmidt skribis 2005-10-10 19:59 (+0200): >> my @args = ( (a => 1), b => 2 ); # is sugar for >> my @args = ( (a => 1), (b => 2) ); J> Please, no. Please let the pair constructor be =>, not (=>). There is J> really no need for this operator to consist of both infix and circumfix J> parts. Please leave the parens for grouping (and in calls: breaking J> recognition). he isn't saying that. the example shows the b => 2 is fine and will be parsed as if it were ( b => 2 ). the point is how pairs in an array are splatted or not to names args. and if i get it right, *hash( @args ) is what is needed to convert an array of pairs to be used as named params. uri -- Uri Guttman ------ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------- http://www.stemsystems.com --Perl Consulting, Stem Development, Systems Architecture, Design and Coding- Search or Offer Perl Jobs ---------------------------- http://jobs.perl.org
