Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Nick~ | | On 10/26/05, Nick Glencross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > Guy, | > | > As a follow-up to a discussion a few days ago about binding parrot to | > C++ functions, is making it possible to compile parrot with a C++ | > compiler a 'Bad Thing'? | | I like the idea, but I tend to like C++ more than reason would dictate.
I have some personal interests in the idea, and in general I think it may brings substantial benefits to and perspectives on the code base. -- Gaby
