On 29/10/05, Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Moving on.
>
> role Baz {
> does Bar;
> }
>
> By my free-derivation (or composition in this case, I guess)
> principle, Baz is now equivalent to Foo. If you think of them as
> interfaces, it makes perfect sense. Baz provides no additional
> implementations, nor imposes any additional requirements, and thus you
> must do precisely the same things to conform to Baz as to Foo.
>
> Baz: bar() default
You meant to write 'equivalent to Bar', not Foo, right?
Stuart
