On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 03:16:01PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > I'd like to see 
> > that sort of thing as patches to Test::Harness rather than in a fork.
> 
> Well, I started with Test::Harness and gradually revamped it. The problem is 
> that some aspects of the T::H interface suck, and I had to change the 
> interface in a non-backwards-compatible way.

Given that the existing interface is pretty simple, I really don't see why 
one has to completely fork the code base just to put on a new interface.  
Surely any new code with a fancy new interface can continue to emulate the 
old one.


-- 
Michael G Schwern     [EMAIL PROTECTED]     http://www.pobox.com/~schwern
Don't try the paranormal until you know what's normal.
        -- "Lords and Ladies" by Terry Prachett

Reply via email to