On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 02:18:24PM -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: : Ick, \d65 in a pattern looks really odd to me. I'll register my : distaste for this one message, and then I'll have to take a stiff : drink or something before I can bring myself to implement it. :-|
I suppose we could even go as far as to make bare \o match <+[0..7]> and bare \x match <+[0..9a..fA..F]>. Unfortunately that doesn't extend to \b... Larry
