Larry Wall wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 08:29:29PM +0000, Luke Palmer wrote: > : The only remaining problem is that we have no syntax for ...3, which > : doesn't make sense as a list, but does make sense as a range. > > Well, it could be a lazy list that you only ever pop, I suppose. > In any event, it doesn't work syntactically because ... is where a > term is expected, so it's a yada-yada-yada with an unexpected term > following it.
To bad; because that's exactly the syntax that I'd expect to use. -- Jonathan "Dataweaver" Lang
