On Mar 1, 2006, at 14:46, Will Coleda wrote:
We already have at least one language implementation that used to work just fine using the stack, but has been crippled with various deprecations over the last few years.
If you are speaking of forth here, then no. That was broken by design. It jumped directly into evaled code. To get that working it just turned off bounds checking for the runloops (i.e. if the program counter is inside the current code segment limits).
leo
