On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 11:39 +0200, demerphq wrote: > Test names shouldnt be optional.
I disagree. I would find it cumbersome to have to come up with a description for each and every test. > Finding a particular test in a file by its number can be quite > difficult, especially in test files where you dont have stuff like > > 'ok 26'. > > When ok() and is() are silently incrementing the counter and test > names arent used how is one supposed to find the failing test? As you > probably know it can be quite difficult. Well, if the test passes, there's no need to know where exactly it's located. If it fails, the diagnostics contain the line number: not ok 6 # Failed test in t/xxx.t at line 26. I've never seen incorrect line numbers. -- Bye, -Torsten
