On 19/07/06, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/17/06, demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IMO the best way to do that is to make test names mandatory. The file and line number provided by the failing test isn't enough to find it?
Not always, but even so, mandatory test names is all kinds of bad, including "not very perlish" and "likely to turn beginners away from testing", and "likely to have people typing in random characters to invent a test name" and "creating clashing test names by accident". I'd like test names to be more widespread, but I really don't want them mandatory. osfameron
