Whups, sorry, I meant to say "OS X 10.3", with its gcc (3.3). I agree that it seems to build fine on Tiger.
On 8/30/06, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What version of OSX and gcc are you using? I haven't seen this problem on 10.4.7 PPC with gcc 4.0.1. Did it just break recently?? Not that I see any problem applying this patch, regardless. On Aug 30, 2006, at 4:55 PM, Mark J. Reed wrote: > Currently compilation fails on OS X with gcc/g++, because "-bundle" > as the > first argument gets interpreted as a request to run the "undle" > version of > the compiler. It works fine as a later argument, so there's no > need to > break compatibility with the Apple compiler: > > Index: config/init/hints/darwin.pm > =================================================================== > --- config/init/hints/darwin.pm (revision 14355) > +++ config/init/hints/darwin.pm (working copy) > @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ > link => 'c++', > ld => 'c++', > ld_share_flags => '-dynamiclib -undefined suppress', > - ld_load_flags => '-bundle -undefined suppress', > + ld_load_flags => '-undefined suppress -bundle', > memalign => 'some_memalign', > has_dynamic_linking => 1, > # XXX when built against a dynamic libparrot > installable_parrot > records > > -- > Mark J. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Will "Coke" Coleda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Mark J. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
