Aww - I was wondering if it was gcc 4. gcc 3.4 seems to let that one by. -J
-- On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 10:20:39AM -0400, Will Coleda wrote: > gcc 4.0.1, os x 10.4.7, PPC, ccflags .= " -pipe -fno-common -Wno-long- > double -Wno-long-long -std=c89 -pedantic "; > > (which is still too many warnings, but leo noted this particular one > could stand to be fixed, as time permits.) > > On Aug 31, 2006, at 5:34 AM, Joshua Hoblitt wrote: > > >What compiler is generating warnings? > > > >-J > > > >-- > >On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 07:03:44PM -0700, Will Coleda wrote: > >># New Ticket Created by Will Coleda > >># Please include the string: [perl #40253] > >># in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > >># <URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=40253 > > >> > >> > >>The attached patch casts all the printfs arguments corresponding > >>to "% > >>p" to be (void *), to avoid compiler warnings. > >> > >>However, the following tests fail after the change: > >> > >>Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed > >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>--- > >>------- > >>t/dynoplibs/myops.t 1 256 7 1 14.29% 6 > >>t/examples/library.t 1 256 4 1 25.00% 3 > >>t/library/pcre.t 1 256 1 1 100.00% 1 > >> > >>I leave it to the determined reader to figure out why. =-) > > -- > Will "Coke" Coleda > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
pgp7PUmmlVtLu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
