On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 10:10:04AM +0200, Juerd wrote:
: Larry Wall skribis 2006-09-20 16:34 (-0700):
: > That should work but my preference is just
: > my @bar = $q.param<bar>[];
: > That is, empty .[] has the same arrayifying semantics as @. (This is
: > currently b0rken in pugs though.) Likewise .{} is equivalen to %.
:
: Nice, but what's the syntax for an empty slice then?
Oh, I expect .[()] would work for that. Why you'd want one beats me.
Certainly it would work as a degenerate case of [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well.
Larry
