Aaron Sherman wrote:
Proposal: A sigil followed by [...] is always a composer for that type.
%[...] - Hash. Unicode: ⦃...⦄
@[...] - Array. Unicode: [...]
...
I left out ::, which is probably a mistake. Part of the elegance of
this, IMHO, is that it behaves the same for all sigils. The body of ::
should probably be a capture whose invocant (required) is a type name:
::[Foo: 1,2,:x<3>,:y<4>]
Which is identical to:
Foo.new(1,2,:x<3>,:y<4>)
Unicode for that seems like overkill, but if we needed it, ⦗...⦘ would
suffice. Thus:
⦗Foo: 1,2,:x<3>,:y<4>⦘
That gives me the visual sense that something big and heavy is being
created ;-)
