On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 04:02:21AM -0800, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote: > Is this issue considered resolved for BSD and/or has acceptable test > coverage? > > I believe that things were alright for both OpenBSD and NetBSD. Solaris is still an issue. t/op/trans.t passes when run like
perl t/harness t/op/trans.t but fails miserably when run like perl t/harness -v t/op/trans.t Steve Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Tue Mar 21 17:46:51 2006, jisom wrote: > > It seems I'm mistaking problems. OpenBSD does do atan2 correctly. > > But, OpenBSD doesn't like printing "-0.0". It'll print it as positive. > > I'm not sure how to get it to print -0 instead of +0. > > > > On Mar 21, 2006, at 5:58 PM, Joshua Hoblitt wrote: > > > > > Steve, > > > > > > What version of OpenBSD were you running (perhaps something old or > > > direct from CVS)? > > > > > > -J > > > > > > -- > > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 03:13:18PM -0800, Joshua Isom via RT wrote: > > >> On OpenBSD 3.8 x86, I still get the failures with -0.0/0.0. Check the > > >> smokes... > > >> > > >> On Mar 21, 2006, at 3:01 PM, Joshua Hoblitt wrote: > > >> > > >>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 06:42:42AM -0800, Steve Peters via RT wrote: > > >>>>> [jhoblitt - Sun Jan 01 18:49:23 2006]: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I've commited a possible fix for openbsd, cygwin, & solaris as > > >>>> changesets > > >>>>> r10839 & r10843. I basically applied what Steve Peters proposed > > >>>>> but > > >>>>> with the changes in math.c instead of creating init.c (as agreed to > > >>>>> on > > >>>>> #parrot). > > >>>>> > > >>>>> This doesn't appear to have done anything for gcc/solaris... can > > >>>>> someone > > >>>>> test openbsd and cygwin? > > >>>> > > >>>> These changes fixed OpenBSD and were used with NetBSD to allow it to > > >>>> pass all of its tests. That leaves the issue open for Solaris and > > >>>> Cygwin. > > >>> > > >>> Fantastic. Thanks for the update. > > >>> > > >>> Can someone test this on Cygwin? > > >>> > > >>> -J > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >> > > >> > > > >
