Smylers schreef: > Ruud H.G. van Tol: >> Darren Duncan: >>> TSa:
>>>> set operations ... make them Bag operations to start with. >>> >>> I agree with ... making Set the main type and making Bag an >>> extension built upon that, as complex is built upon num, etc. >> >> I don't think that will work out. Modification of a Set is more >> complex than modification of a Bag, so in that sense the Bag is the >> main type. > > Is this still the Perl 6 _Language_ group? The one where we consider > what Perl 6 will do, and leave the implementation details to others? I don't consider much in this thread implementation oriented. In the part that you quote, I mentioned that putting a hierarchical order on Set vs. Bag has problems, because that order only applies to one side of them. The order was used for fall-back, to which I mentioned a context driven approach (like wantarray). -- Affijn, Ruud "Gewoon is een tijger."
