On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 11:08:24AM -0700, James Keenan wrote: [ I've just noticed this via a summary that I rescued from spamassassin's rather overenthusiastic clutches. Thanks Ann. ]
> I've found through experience that running Devel::Cover to perform > coverage analysis on my code sometimes turns up problems that don't > appear when running 'prove' or 'make test' without Devel::Cover. [ snip details ] > Ideas? Not really, I'm afraid. I don't think I've seen a similar problem with Devel::Cover and any other code. Devel::Cover has sometimes uncovered questionable constructs that have otherwise gone unnoticed, but my first thoughts would be that it was a bug in Devel::Cover. Has anyone managed to shine any additional light on this in the last six weeks? -- Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pjcj.net
