On 10/1/07, Paul Cochrane via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > src/exceptions.c has a todo comment in it: > > * XXX TODO get rid of all the internal_exceptions or call them > * with an interpreter arg > > The fact that we can't completely get rid of internal_exception() has > already been discussed (in some instances it's not appropriate to > replace with real_exception()). However, should internal_exception() > take an interpreter arg? > from my understanding, internal_exception()s occur when something has gone horribly wrong, like when you don't have a valid interpreter anymore.
upon further investigation, it seems this comment is *inside* the internal_exception function definition. that suggests to me that perhaps there's some merit to the idea. however, i can't imagine why, so i'm interested in ideas and/or recollections from others. ~jerry
